Bring technical records, effort and project costs together so valuable R&D work doesn’t get missed. Help your team and advisers assess opportunities with a clearer evidence base.
Talk through your processBring relevant technical and effort records together. Give reviewers direct access to the source material behind a draft explanation.
Connect AI use to work and projects ↗| Record | Status |
|---|---|
| Technical investigation | Linked |
| Experiment results | Linked |
| Confirmed effort | Awaiting confirmation |
Flag missing dates, unsupported statements and incomplete records. Give each gap an owner who can resolve it.
Explore agents, data stores and views ↗| Gap | Owner |
|---|---|
| Describe the technical uncertainty | Technical lead |
| Confirm experiment dates | Project lead |
| Approve effort records | Team lead |
Assemble the checked records and draft explanations. Your advisers assess eligibility and prepare the claim with your team.
Build views for your team ↗| Section | Status |
|---|---|
| Project explanation | Reviewed by technical lead |
| Supporting records | Attached |
| Eligibility assessment | With adviser |
We agree which records, access and controls your workflow needs, then connect the relevant systems.
Explore all integrations ↗Track preparation time, missing evidence, review corrections and the time your advisers spend resolving gaps.
We agree the baseline with you, build around your systems and keep improving the application as your work changes.
Show us the process, the systems and where your team loses time.
Talk to FlowstateNo. Classification can help organize evidence for a qualified reviewer. Eligibility depends on the work and the rules that apply, not on a generated label.
Bring relevant project and effort records together, highlight missing information and route questions to the people who did the work. Keep their corrections and supporting sources.
